Do you agree that products always have room for improvement?
"Every day there are little things in software that we find annoying. Some write books about it, like Annoyances.org, but I thought this site would be more constructive.
BetterSoftwareSuggestions.com is proudly maintained by myself and the developers at SSW."
I love using Microsoft Forms and in the end, reviewing the answers is fun. Suggestions to make it even better:
As the administrator, add the functionality to edit fields that are incorrect. For example here the user was accidentally logged in as “SVC_Dash” instead of “Greg”…
Of course, there should be history, if you want to round out the feature.
And the most simple improvement would be to make the UX clearer. In this case, the current user is shown, but it is too subtle and users that have made the below mistake, did not know they had not logged out of their non-primary account.
I’d love know if others would like this feature too…
I’d like to talk about this new feature … aka Network Device Interface for video recordings.
At SSW we have 3 guys who run SSW TV (a youtube channel for .NET and Azure devs) so we are all excited about the new NDI feature – this was released in Microsoft Teams a week ago (September 2020).
We also run 6 .NET + Azure User Groups around Australia and China and it has been really hard during COVID-19 to run these live. We have been pre-recording the sessions and then pretending they are live and it has worked. That said, it is not at all the same as a live event.
Therefore I am certain NDI It is going to help us so much. I want to share our first experience from our first live event using NDI. We were able to run a free event with 5 speakers and it went well from my side. Afterwards this was sent to me from one of the SSW TV engineers who ran the event using the new NDI feature of Teams.
From: Raj
Hi Adam
The experience was mixed. When it works the feature allows me to really pull off a broadcast level show (without very expensive specialist hardware).
You can see below the multi view and picture in picture (of 5 speakers) that I was able to create. Each person on the call is an individual input much like a normal camera, so I’m able to do the same things as if I had a real in-studio multi-camera setup (like you would see on the news or big broadcast shows).
Figure: This live mix is amazing and was easy to make. I got this all working in 20 minutes (and most of that was in photoshop)
So in theory this should be excellent, but there are some issues that are essentially deal-breakers.
Firstly, the general reliability. In the image below you can see one of the sources has changed from the person’s camera to a Teams logo. This must be a Teams bug.
For some reason the input randomly does this with some people and not others. It happened during our stream with the screenshare input (a big deal this is the most important thing I want to output).
In other tests, this hasn’t happened at all, so it seems to be random. It can’t be blamed on networking issues because technically the NDI output is still active, because if it wasn’t, you’d be seeing a black screen.
Figure: Bug – live stream mixer
Secondly, I love that I can bring in the screen share as its own source, as I can do lots of funky looking things like the picture in picture. However, my second issue is to do with the screen sharing output. That massive Microsoft logo watermark in the top right is extremely intrusive and ruins the shot. For some reason, it only appears over the screen share output, which makes no sense to me since the majority of screen shares will be Windows-based machines where their branding is clearly visible. This is completely unnecessary and ruins what is otherwise a super useful feature of Teams.
> Teams released an update with NDI integration. I’m finding that in a scheduled teams meeting, there’s a god awful watermark in upper right corner over NDI
This will need to be fixed in order for us to use this. It’s not just distracting, it’s actually ruining the user experience because it covers the content (e.g. Visual Studio coding and PowerPoints etc.). SSW is an enterprise customer and this just seems entirely unnecessary. Even if it’s an extra charge, the option should be there to remove it.
Figure: Top right – terrible watermark size and placement. It is the opposite of subtle
NDI (Network Device Interface) is great… For those that don’t know it is an open standard invented by NDI.tv | Your Official Destination for All Things NDI® Microsoft Teams has now started to bring this to the masses!
Well done for beating Zoom ⭐
I seriously hope Microsoft keep the quality higher than the Zoom team can.
My questions and suggestions:
For a company, it is not on by default until the System Administrator enables that… I’d love to know if it was purely for privacy reasons. I would prefer it on by default to increase adoption.
For a user, it is not on by default in the app, and when you turn it on…. It turns off when you leave Teams! So next time I open Teams I have to turn on NDI again. That seems like a bug to me.
I assume NDI uses up some background processing when in use – I think I see the CPU work harder when connected to an NDI device of my TV guys. I love to see a quality option E.g. NDI quality: High | Normal | Low
Make the UX easy. Relocate the NDI setting so it is simple to access. Currently, you need to go to Profile | Settings | Permissions | NDI It should be as easy as sharing your screen and sound. When you share your screen there is a checkbox to share audio being “Include Computer Sound”. Copy that UX. E.g. so when you turn on your camera, add a checkbox to “Share with NDI” or put it in the “…” menu (see image below)
We want a ‘Team Calendar’ tab to put on each Team ….. we want team members to make calendar invitations from the Team, not from their personal calendar… as it is part of the information of the team.
It would be awesome if we could see who added or configured a widget on an Application Insights dashboard.
When a widget has appeared on the page and you would like to speak to the person about the purpose of it, it would be nice to see an “Activity Log” or “Dashboard History” page.
Who added this widget? The Application Insights Dashboard should have an “Activity Log”
Microsoft Teams suggestion – Help me find the highlight and font color
I expect no-one uses these 2 buttons regularly like they do in Outlook and Word. Therefore I think if you look at the current status of usage, these icons would not be used that much. If you were to change them to look just like Microsoft Word I’d bet the usage figures would go up.
Please consider using the same colour on the highlight and font colour icons
Figure: Good example – In Word, I am very used to seeing the yellow and the redFigure: Bad example – In Teams, I think these 2 icons are unrecognizable !! The A looks like an underline
(Please tell me if I got this wrong and it is for the Microsoft Forms Team)
In Teams, you may have mistakenly moved a Microsoft Form into the team and now you want to get rid of it… but it is quite invisible.
Can you add an easy way to get to this screen (on the right)? Maybe add a 3rd option (after Rename and Remove) called “View this Form on Microsoft Forms | Group Forms”
I hope this helps…
Figure: Can we have an easy way to get to the screen on the right?
When looking at form responses and seeing “Respondent x” it is an unpleasant experience.
This happens when you change the form to be available outside the organization. Now all responses are anonymous.
This should not happen for the internal employees.
Figure: In this case, the form was changed midway to allow external people also to join in. Unfortunately, all respondents (including internal) are now anonymous 💥
Suggestion to Microsoft: Please add a new setting that requires you to log in to a Microsoft account before submitting a response (could be your Domain eg. SSW or personal). Then we can share the Form externally, but also store the internal employee names on the submitted form (essential for follow up questions).
Nasty workaround: Add an extra question to the form asking who it is, but that still wouldn’t give us the email address… So we would need to add another question for that too.
- 
